More Litigation news More news in Vermont Find Litigation lawyers in Vermont
In a landmark ruling, the Vermont Supreme Court has upheld a lower court decision in favor of a same-sex couple who sued a local bakery for discrimination based on their sexual orientation. The case, which has been closely watched by advocates for LGBT rights, dates back to an incident that occurred in 2022 when Jack and Emily Thompson attempted to order a wedding cake for their upcoming nuptials.The Thompsons, who have been together for eight years, visited Sweet Treats Bakery in Burlington and met with the owner, Sarah Johnson, to discuss their cake design. However, when Johnson learned that the couple was same-sex, she allegedly refused to serve them, citing her religious beliefs as the reason for denying them service.The Thompsons filed a lawsuit against Sweet Treats Bakery, claiming that they had been discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation. The case made its way through the Vermont court system, with the lower court ruling in favor of the Thompsons and ordering Sweet Treats Bakery to pay damages for emotional distress and attorney's fees.Sweet Treats Bakery appealed the decision to the Vermont Supreme Court, arguing that the ruling violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of religion. However, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court upheld the lower court's ruling, stating that the bakery's refusal to serve the Thompsons constituted discrimination based on sexual orientation, which is prohibited under state law.The Thompsons expressed relief and satisfaction with the court's decision, stating that they hope it sends a clear message that discrimination against LGBT individuals will not be tolerated in Vermont. Their lawyer, Rebecca Greenstein, praised the court for upholding the rights of LGBT individuals to be treated equally under the law.The ruling in the Thompsons' case is expected to have far-reaching implications for businesses in Vermont and beyond, as it sets a precedent for how courts should handle cases of discrimination based on sexual orientation. Advocates for LGBT rights are hopeful that this decision will lead to greater protections for LGBT individuals in all areas of public life.