More Eminent Domain news More news in South Carolina Find Eminent Domain lawyers in South Carolina
On September 16, 2025, the South Carolina Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in an eminent domain case that could have far-reaching implications for property rights in the state. The case, which involved the City of Charleston's attempt to seize land for a proposed parking garage, pitted the city against a group of property owners who refused to sell their land.In a unanimous ruling, the court sided with the property owners, upholding their right to keep their land and denying the city's eminent domain claim. The decision was hailed as a victory for property rights advocates and a blow to government overreach.The case began in 2023 when the City of Charleston sought to acquire several parcels of land in the historic district to build a parking garage. The city argued that the project was necessary to alleviate parking congestion in the area and promote economic development.However, the property owners contested the city's right to take their land through eminent domain, arguing that the project was not a legitimate public use and that the city's actions violated their constitutional rights. The case made its way through the lower courts before reaching the South Carolina Supreme Court.In its ruling, the court held that the city had not proven that the project constituted a legitimate public use as required by the state constitution. The court also found that the city had not made a good faith effort to negotiate with the property owners before resorting to eminent domain.The decision has been praised by property rights activists and legal experts, who see it as a victory for individual property owners against government overreach. Critics of eminent domain have long argued that the power of government to seize private property for public use is often abused, leading to unjust outcomes for property owners.The City of Charleston has not yet commented on the ruling, but it is expected to have significant implications for future eminent domain cases in South Carolina. The decision sets a precedent for courts to closely scrutinize government actions and ensure that eminent domain is used only as a last resort for legitimate public uses.