In a landmark decision on July 10, 2025, the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled on a contentious international law dispute regarding property rights between a local developer and an international corporation. The case, which has been closely watched by legal experts and scholars, centered around the question of whether international law should take precedence over domestic law when it comes to property ownership.The dispute arose when a North Carolina developer, John Smith, purchased a parcel of land from the state government with the intention of building a luxury resort. However, shortly after purchasing the land, an international corporation, Global Investments Inc., claimed that the property was part of a larger piece of land that they had acquired through a legal transaction in their home country. Global Investments Inc. argued that their ownership of the land should hold precedence over Smith's purchase.The case made its way through the North Carolina court system, with both parties presenting compelling arguments based on international treaties and conventions. Smith's legal team argued that the United States Constitution and state property laws should take precedence over any international agreements, while Global Investments Inc. claimed that their ownership rights should be respected under the principles of international law.After months of legal arguments and deliberations, the North Carolina Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in favor of Smith, upholding his right to the property in question. In their ruling, the court emphasized the importance of domestic laws in determining property rights within state borders, stating that international law should only be considered when it does not conflict with existing legal frameworks.The decision has been hailed as a victory for property rights advocates in North Carolina, who have expressed concerns about the growing influence of international law in domestic legal disputes. Legal experts have noted that the case sets an important precedent for future international law disputes in the state, reaffirming the primacy of domestic laws in resolving conflicts over property ownership.As North Carolina continues to grapple with global economic integration and cross-border legal issues, the court's decision serves as a reminder of the importance of balancing international norms with domestic legal principles. The ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for property rights and international law in the state, setting a clear framework for resolving similar disputes in the future.