More Constitutional Law news More news in North Carolina Find Constitutional Law lawyers in North Carolina
In a landmark decision, the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled on Friday, January 5, 2026, regarding a controversial amendment to the state constitution. The amendment in question, which was passed by voters in a close referendum in 2024, sought to limit the rights of certain marginalized groups within the state.The amendment, known as Amendment 14-B, aimed to restrict the rights of LGBTQ individuals, immigrants, and women. It called for the denial of certain legal protections, including marriage rights, adoption rights, and access to healthcare services, to these groups based on their identities.Opponents of the amendment, including civil rights groups, LGBTQ advocates, and women's rights organizations, immediately challenged its constitutionality in court. They argued that Amendment 14-B violated the equal protection and due process clauses of the North Carolina Constitution, as well as the U.S. Constitution.After months of legal arguments and deliberation, the North Carolina Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling declaring Amendment 14-B unconstitutional. In their decision, the justices cited the fundamental principles of equality and fairness enshrined in the state constitution, stating that any law or amendment that discriminates against certain groups based on inherent characteristics is inherently unjust and unconstitutional.The ruling was met with widespread celebration among opponents of Amendment 14-B, who hailed it as a victory for civil rights and equality in North Carolina. LGBTQ advocates, in particular, expressed relief and gratitude for the court's decision, which they said affirmed their right to equal treatment under the law.However, supporters of the amendment, including conservative lawmakers and religious groups, condemned the court's ruling as judicial activism and vowed to continue fighting for its implementation. They argued that the will of the voters, who had approved Amendment 14-B in a democratic referendum, should be respected and upheld.The legal battle over Amendment 14-B may not be over, as supporters of the amendment could seek to challenge the Supreme Court's ruling in federal court. Nevertheless, for now, the decision stands as a significant victory for the marginalized communities whose rights were at stake. It also serves as a powerful reminder of the crucial role that the judiciary plays in upholding the principles of equality and justice in society.