More Trial Practice news More news in New Hampshire Find Trial Practice lawyers in New Hampshire
On May 24, 2026, the legal community in New Hampshire was abuzz with several key developments in trial practice. From groundbreaking court decisions to new initiatives, here are some of the highlights from that day:1. Landmark ruling on admissibility of digital evidence: In a landmark decision, the New Hampshire Supreme Court ruled that digital evidence obtained from social media platforms is admissible in court. The ruling came in a case involving a dispute over a contract, where the defendant had tried to exclude evidence obtained from the plaintiff's Facebook account. The court held that such evidence is relevant and can be admitted, setting a precedent for future cases in the state.2. Launch of new alternative dispute resolution program: The New Hampshire Bar Association announced the launch of a new alternative dispute resolution program aimed at promoting faster and more cost-effective resolution of legal disputes. The program, which offers mediation and arbitration services to parties involved in civil cases, is expected to help alleviate the backlog of cases in the state's court system and provide parties with more control over the resolution process.3. Trial advocacy workshop for young lawyers: The New Hampshire Trial Lawyers Association hosted a trial advocacy workshop for young lawyers looking to hone their courtroom skills. The workshop, led by experienced trial attorneys, covered topics such as witness examination, opening and closing arguments, and evidentiary objections. Attendees praised the workshop for its practical insights and hands-on approach to trial practice.4. Continued debate over jury selection process: The issue of jury selection continued to be a hot topic among legal practitioners in New Hampshire, with some calling for reforms to make the process more transparent and inclusive. Critics argued that the current system of peremptory challenges allows attorneys to exclude jurors based on arbitrary criteria, leading to biased juries. Proponents countered that the system is essential for ensuring fair trials and protecting the rights of the accused.Overall, May 24, 2026, was a day filled with significant developments in trial practice in New Hampshire, as the legal community grappled with important issues and worked towards improving the administration of justice in the state.