On February 17, 2026, the Minnesota Supreme Court made a landmark decision in an eminent domain case that will allow the state to proceed with a crucial infrastructure project. The case centered around the state's efforts to acquire land from several property owners in order to expand a major highway in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area.The property owners had challenged the state's use of eminent domain, arguing that the project was not necessary and that it would have a negative impact on their businesses and livelihoods. However, after years of legal battles and hearings, the Supreme Court ultimately sided with the state, ruling that the project was in the public interest and that it was a valid use of eminent domain.In a statement following the ruling, Governor Sarah Johnson praised the court's decision, calling it a "victory for progress and for the people of Minnesota." She went on to say that the infrastructure project would create jobs, improve transportation efficiency, and stimulate economic growth in the region.While the property owners expressed disappointment in the court's decision, they acknowledged that they had exhausted all legal avenues for recourse. Some expressed concerns about the impact that the project would have on their properties and businesses, but others acknowledged that the state had the right to use eminent domain for public projects.The infrastructure project is expected to begin construction later this year and is projected to be completed within the next five years. It will involve widening the highway, adding new lanes, and improving traffic flow in the area. The state Department of Transportation has pledged to work closely with affected property owners to minimize disruptions and address any concerns they may have.Overall, the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of the eminent domain case is seen as a significant win for the state of Minnesota and for proponents of infrastructure development. It highlights the delicate balance between public interests and property rights, and sets a precedent for future eminent domain cases in the state.