More Constitutional Law news More news in Minnesota Find Constitutional Law lawyers in Minnesota
In a landmark ruling, the Minnesota Supreme Court declared several key discrimination laws in the state unconstitutional on March 20, 2026. The decision comes after years of legal battles and challenges to the existing laws, which have been criticized for being outdated and discriminatory.The ruling, which was unanimous among the seven justices, focused on several specific provisions within the state's discrimination laws, particularly those pertaining to housing and employment. The court held that these provisions were in violation of the Minnesota Constitution's Equal Protection Clause, which guarantees all residents equal protection under the law.One of the key provisions struck down by the court was a law that allowed landlords to refuse housing to individuals based on their race, ethnicity, or other protected characteristics. The court found that this provision perpetuated systemic racism and discrimination, particularly against minority communities.Additionally, the court also addressed provisions within the state's employment laws that allowed employers to discriminate against employees based on their gender, sexual orientation, or disability status. The court argued that these provisions were in direct conflict with the state's commitment to equality and fairness in the workplace.The decision has been widely praised by civil rights activists and advocacy groups, who have long been fighting for reforms to the state's discrimination laws. In a statement following the ruling, a spokesperson for the Minnesota ACLU said, "This decision is a critical step towards ensuring that all Minnesotans are treated fairly and equally under the law. We applaud the court for upholding the principles of justice and equality."The ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for Minnesota's legal landscape, with lawmakers now facing pressure to enact new, more inclusive discrimination laws that align with the state constitution. It remains to be seen how the state government will respond to the court's decision, but many are hopeful that this ruling will be a catalyst for broader reforms in the fight against discrimination in Minnesota.